Legal Opinion

State v. Wilson, 21738 (9-21-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 2007No. 21738PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Lawrence E. Wilson appeals from an order dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief on the grounds that it was untimely. In July, 2006, Wilson filed a petition for post-conviction relief, contending that the original judgment entry is void ab initio and should be vacated. The crux of Wilson's petition is that the original indictment is defective, divesting the trial court of subject-matter jurisdiction over his case. The State contends that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to hear the petition because of its untimeliness. The trial court agreed with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Harris v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State v. ColemanOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. State v. PillowOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. SandsOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State v. PooleOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API