Legal Opinion

Richardson v. City of Albuquerque

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 22, 1988No. 86-1501PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRORBY, Circuit Judge.

Sandra Richardson brought claims of sex, age, and handicap discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Albuquerque and defendant police officers arising out of her termination as a police cadet. Richardson further claimed her termination, without notice and hearing, denied her due process in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Richardson also asserted pendent state claims of breach of contract, wrongful discharge, intentional interference with contract, outrageous conduct, and defamation. At the conclusion of Richardson’s case, the trial court directed a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Randy Abercrombie v. City of Catoosa, Oklahoma Mayor Curtis Conley and Police Chief Benny DirckCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  2. John W. Whalen v. Unit Rig, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Terex Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Mrl Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. Dickens v. Snodgrass, Dunlap & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  4. Gretchen Getter v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. Campbell v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API