in Re Stacey Bent and Mark Bent
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown
In recent years this Court has sought to protect the constitutional right to a trial by jury by requiring trial courts to provide litigants with “an understandable, reasonably specific explanation” for setting aside a jury verdict and ordering a new trial. In re Columbia Med. Ctr. of Las Colinas, Subsidiary, L.P., 290 S.W.3d 204, 213 (Tex.2009). Generally, this requirement is satisfied when a trial court’s stated reason is “a reason for which a new trial is legally appropriate” and “is specific enough to indicate that the trial court did not simply parrot a pro forma template, but rather…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Bocquet v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Columbia Medical Center of Las Colinas, Subsidiary, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Rohrmoos Venture, Eric Langford, Dan Basso, and Tobin Grove v. Utsw DVA Healthcare, LlpTexas Supreme Court · 2019
- United Scaffolding, Inc. v. James LevineTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- in Re National Lloyds Insurance Company, Wardlaw Claims Service, Inc. and Ideal Adjusting, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2017
- in Re Patti J. Wagner, as Guardian of Jenny Wagner, an Incapacitated Adult, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2017
- In re BCH Development, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.