Legal Opinion

in Re Stacey Bent and Mark Bent

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 2016No. 14-1006PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown

In recent years this Court has sought to protect the constitutional right to a trial by jury by requiring trial courts to provide litigants with “an understandable, reasonably specific explanation” for setting aside a jury verdict and ordering a new trial. In re Columbia Med. Ctr. of Las Colinas, Subsidiary, L.P., 290 S.W.3d 204, 213 (Tex.2009). Generally, this requirement is satisfied when a trial court’s stated reason is “a reason for which a new trial is legally appropriate” and “is specific enough to indicate that the trial court did not simply parrot a pro forma template, but rather…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Bocquet v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. In Re Columbia Medical Center of Las Colinas, Subsidiary, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Rohrmoos Venture, Eric Langford, Dan Basso, and Tobin Grove v. Utsw DVA Healthcare, LlpTexas Supreme Court · 2019
  2. United Scaffolding, Inc. v. James LevineTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  3. in Re National Lloyds Insurance Company, Wardlaw Claims Service, Inc. and Ideal Adjusting, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2017
  4. in Re Patti J. Wagner, as Guardian of Jenny Wagner, an Incapacitated Adult, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2017
  5. In re BCH Development, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API