Legal Opinion

Employers Assurance Corp. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1915No. S.F. No. 7206PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPLICATION originally made to the Supreme Court of the State of California for a writ of review against the Industrial Accident Commission. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

This proceeding was instituted to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission allowing compensation to the wife of George A. Marsters for the death of her husband.

Marsters in-his lifetime had been in the employ of Hind, Rolph & Co., owners of the barge “Invincible.” The petitioner, Employers Assurance Corporation, Limited, was the insurance carrier for the said Hind, Rolph & Co. The com mission found that Marsters was injured by accident on the thirtieth day of March, 1914, while in the employment of Hind, Rolph & Co., and that said accident arose out of and happened in the course…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Great Western Power Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Englebretson v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Walker v. City of San GabrielCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Olson-Hall v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  4. Montaner v. Comisión IndustrialSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1939
  5. Desert Turf Club v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API