Harmon v. State

Evidence that the defendant and three others were lying on the ground in a secluded spot with money before them, that each had cards in his hand, and that on being discovered all attempted to escape, was sufficient to sustain a verdict that thS defendant was guilty of playing and betting at a game played with cards for money. Pacetti v. State, 82 Ga. 297 ; Arnold v. State, 117 Ga. 706. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.