Power v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Accusation of .gaming; from city court of Danielsville — Judge Moseleji. June 15, 1910.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
1. The evidence authorized the conviction, and the ruling is controlled by the decisions in Colbert v. State, supra, Griffin v. State, 2 Ga. App. 534 (58 S. E. 781), and Harman v. State, 120 Ga. 197 (47 S. E. 547).
2, There was no error in overruling the motion for a continuance. The evidence showed that the absent witness was inaccessible, and it was not shown and could not be shown that his attendance was expected at the next term of court.. Howard v. State, 7 Ga. App. 61 (65 S. E. 1076). Judgment affirmed.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Harmon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ford v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Mims v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Patton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- McFarlin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.