Legal Opinion
Cromer-Kendall v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 9, 2004No. CIV.A.00-1338(RBW)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
This is an action brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2. The plaintiff is seeking redress for alleged “same sex” discrimination, sexual harassment, the creation of a sexually hostile work environment, retaliation, and severe emotional distress. 1 This matter is currently before the Court on the defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Def.’s Mot.”), the plaintiffs opposition to the motion (“Pl.’s Opp.”), and the defendant’s reply. For the reasons set forth below, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment will…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McKeithan v. BoarmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Tucker v. Howard University HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Blackburn v. Shelby CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2011
- Burford v. YellenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Aleman-Martinez v. Puerto Rico Federal Affairs AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.