Legal Opinion

Stephanie W. v. Maxwell V.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2014No. 6869 S-15065PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Stephanie W. and Maxwell V. have a son, Terrance. 1 Maxwell sued for eustody of Terrance, and the superior court granted him primary physical custody and joint legal custody. In Stephanie W. v. Maxwell V., 2 we reviewed that first custody order and affirmed it in most respects but remanded for reconsideration of two custody factors. 3 On remand, the superior court again granted Maxwell primary physical custody.

Stephanie appeals this second custody order. Two of her arguments, relating to discovery, were not preserved for appeal, are therefore…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Fernandes v. PortwineAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Sykes v. Melba Creek Mining, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. D.J. v. P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Evans v. EvansAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. U.S. Fabrication & Erection, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Greene v. TinkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Red Elk v. McBrideAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Small v. SayreAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Daggett v. FeeneyAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. James R. v. Kylie R.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API