Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Market Street Railway Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 25, 1931No. Docket No. 7837PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

In this action to recover for personal injuries judgment upon the verdict was entered in favor of plaintiff from which judgment defendant appeals.

Appellant urges several grounds for a reversal, the main contentions being: First, that there is no evidence of negligence on the part of appellant; and second, that even if it can be said that- there is testimony showing negligence on appellant’s part, the evidence shows that respondent was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. In our opinion the latter contention must be sustained and we believe that a discussion of the remaining…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hamlin v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Arnold v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal RailwaysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Larrabee v. Western Pacific Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Brown v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kirk v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Gore v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Lavin v. FereiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Isaacs v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Gibb v. CleaveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API