Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Budget Rent-a-Car Systems, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 10, 1991No. 90CA1530PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge PIERCE.
Budget Rent-a-Car Systems, Inc., a self-insurer, appeals an order of the trial court which apportioned liability between its policy and a policy by United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company. On cross-appeal, USF *479& G requests, if the apportionment order is set aside, that we review a previous order of the trial court which enforced the excess provision in Budget’s policy rather than declaring that policy to be the sole primary coverage. We reverse the order of apportionment and affirm the order finding co-primary coverage.
The dispute at issue arises from an automobile…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chacon v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Kane v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Empire Casualty Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Frank B. Hall & Co. of CaliforniaColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
- Dairyland Insurance v. DrumSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Brna v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Regional Transportation District v. Outdoor Systems, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1999