Senn, Admx. v. Lackner

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

No. 2125. Decided March 8, 1951.

OPINION

By WISEMAN, J:

Submitted on motion for rehearing. There is no rule controlling applications for rehearing but this Court has followed the practice of considering such applications if seasonably filed and where the questions raised merit consideration.

*462Plaintiff-appellee contends that a presumption of agency arose by reason of the fact that the automobile driven by Fink at the time of the collision carried dealer’s license plates of the defendant and that therefore a jury question was presented. In support of this proposition…