Legal Opinion

Stroud v. Sinclair Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 20, 1937No. 32,869PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter comes before us on a motion by appellant to compel obedience by the trial court to the mandate sent to that court in accordance with the opinion filed June 6, 1936, appearing in 144 Kan. 74, 58 P. 2d 77.

The action was one to recover damages, and was tried and submitted on the theory the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applied. The defendant demurred to plaintiff’s evidence and appealed from an adverse ruling. We reversed the trial court, the opinion concluding:

“The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to sustain defendant’s demurrer to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stroud v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Watson v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beloit Building Co. v. QuinnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. Uhl v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  3. Drury v. DrurySupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API