Legal Opinion

Councell v. Douglas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1955No. 34229Published

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, J.

The basic question to be decided on this appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence to justify the jury in finding that Cooksey, at the time of the accident, was operating defendant’s automobile as an agent or servant of defendant, or that the relationship at such time between defendant and Cooksey, with respect to the operation of defendant’s automobile, was one of principal and agent or of master and servant. If there was such evidence, the judgment of the Court of Appeals must be affirmed, and, if not, that judgment must be reversed and final judgment must be rendered for defendant.

*295In…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Gillum v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Bobik v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Babbitt v. SayOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Schickling v. Post Publishing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API