Legal Opinion
Glendale Redevelopment Agency v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 25, 2010No. B212718, B213410PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1393Opinion
ARMSTRONG, J.
Appellants are community redevelopment agencies “empowered to prepare and effectuate a redevelopment plan for the elimination of blighted areas in the community.” (Marek v. Napa Community Redevelopment Agency (1988) 46 Cal.3d 1070, 1082 [251 Cal.Rptr. 778, 761 P.2d 701] (Marek).) Under the Community Redevelopment Law (Cal. Const., art. XVI, § 16; Health & Saf. Code, § 33000 et seq.1), they are able to fund this activity because they are entitled to a certain portion of the property tax attributable to the redevelopment project. The amount is calculated through a statement…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- City of Dinuba v. County of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Schabarum v. California LegislatureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Redevelopment Agency v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Greenwich S.F., LLC v. WongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Covarrubias v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Glendale Redevelopment Agency v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010