Legal Opinion

Loftus v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1980No. Appeal, No. 1680 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mender,

This appeal requires us to determine whether the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) correctly concluded that appellants, members of Teamsters ’ Local 229 and employed by Canada Dry Bottling Company, were ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits, under the provisions of Section 402(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law,1 because their unemployment was due to a work stoppage caused by a strike.

Section 402(d) provides, in pertinent part, that “[a]n employe shall be ineligible for compensation for any week ... (d) [i]n which his unemployment is due…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Philco Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Miller v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Geesey v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Gladieux Food Services, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Quaker Oats Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API