Legal Opinion

Keeney v. Fairfield Resources, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 14, 1996No. 13735PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHealey, J.

This case involves an action commenced in November, 1993, by the plaintiff commissioner of environmental protection (commissioner) against the defendants to enforce certain state environmental laws.1 The commissioner sought, inter alia, injunctive relief pursuant to certain statutes2 and orders requiring the defendants to forfeit moneys to the state pursuant to certain statutes for each violation.3 The trial court denied intervenor status to certain individuals and an association (intervenors), who have appealed from the judgment denying intervention. We conclude that inter-venor status…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Mystic Marinelife Aquarium, Inc. v. GillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Zoning Commission v. Fairfield Resources Management, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  2. Avalonbay Communities, Inc. v. Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. Diamond 67, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. State v. HallConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  5. Garrison v. Planning Board of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API