Legal Opinion

McGinnis v. United States Air Force

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 21, 2003No. C-3-94-30PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXPANDED OPINION AND ENTRY SETTING FORTH THE REASONING AND CITATIONS OF AUTHORITY FOR THE COURT’S OPINION OF MARCH 24, 2000 (DOC. # 116), WHICH SUSTAINED IN PART AND OVERRULED IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 99); CONFERENCE CALL SET

RICE, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs Pamela McGinnis (“McGinnis”) and Charlene Reynolds (“Reynolds”) are African-American civilian employees with the United States Air Force (“USAF”). At all relevant times, Plaintiffs were employed as GS-346-11 Logistics Management Specialists with the Air Force Security Assistance Center (“AFSAC”) at Wright…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bowers v. WynneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. Swann v. Time Warner Entertainment Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
  3. Funai v. BrownleeDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2004
  4. Fischbach v. City of ToledoDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
  5. Bowers v. WynneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API