Legal Opinion

Beeman v. Beeman

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 2005No. 04-68PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[¶ 1] This is an appeal from a child custody decision in a divorce case. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] We will restate the issues presented by the parties as follows:

1. Did the appellant fail to comply with W.R.A.P. 3.03 and fail to provide an adequate record for review and, if so, are sanctions appropriate?

2. Did the district court abuse its discretion in granting custody of the parties’ children to the appellee?

FACTS

[¶ 3] The parties were married in 1995. They have two sons, one born in 1996 and one born in 1998. The appellant filed for divorce on February 19, 2003. After an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Reavis v. ReavisWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Pace v. PaceWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Stadtfeld v. StadtfeldWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Willowbrook Ranch, Inc. v. Nugget Exploration, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Tamra Acorn, Rebecca Shwen, and Federer Holding Company, LLC, a Wyoming close limited liability company v. Lori Moncecchi and Dino MoncecchiWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Montoya v. Navarette-MontoyaWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Painovich v. PainovichWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Billings Gazette v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. In the Matter of Adoption of JrhWyoming Supreme Court · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API