Legal Opinion
Ascione v. Pfizer, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 2, 2004No. 03 CIV. 244(VM)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Mary Ascione (“Ascione”), a Hispanic female over the age of 40, alleges that her former employer, defendant Pfizer, Inc. (“Pfizer”), denied her promotions and ultimately fired her because of her age, national origin, and gender, in violation of federal and state anti-discrimination laws. Pfizer, moving for summary judgment, denies the allegations and counters that Ascione was caught falsifying her overtime records. Pfizer also moves for summary judgment on its counterclaim alleging that Ascione has failed to return a laptop computer. The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Medcalf v. WalshDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Kolesnikow v. Hudson Valley Hospital CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Briggs v. Women in Need, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Gaffney v. Department of Information Technology & TelecommunicationsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Ascione v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005