Legal Opinion

Robert E. Shaffer v. Harold v. Field, Superintendent of California Men's Colony, San Luis Obispo, California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 27, 1973No. 72-1707PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before MERRILL, BROWNING, and WALLACE, Circuit Judges.

2Per curiam

Petitioner was convicted of a violation of California Penal Code § 187. After exhausting state remedies he applied for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The district court denied the writ. See Shaffer v. Field, 339 F.Supp. 997 (C.D.Cal.1972).

Considering the issues in the order presented in the district court’s opinion, we hold as follows:

1. Admission of the spontaneous statements of the dying victim did not violate petitioner’s Sixth Amendment right of confrontation.…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Willard AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  2. Shaffer v. FieldDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1972
  3. United States v. Freddie MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

4Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. FarmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People v. NealIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  4. Pedro Amezquita v. Rafael Hernandez ColonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
  5. People v. OrdunoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API