People v. Orduno
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GARDNER, P. J.—
In this case we hold that in a prosecution under Penal Code section 288 hearsay státements of a child too young to testify may be admitted into evidence if they come within the category of spontaneous declarations or recent complaints. We also hold that the admission of such evidence does not violate defendant’s constitutional right to confrontation.
Charged with child molestation (Pen. Code, § 288), defendant waived jury trial and submitted the matter for decision on the preliminary hearing transcript and portions of a police report. Defendant was found guilty as charged…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- People v. RaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. PensingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. FarmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re Cheryl H.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.