Legal Opinion
Rounds v. The Hartford
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided March 9, 2022No. 4:20-cv-04010Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION TIM ROUNDS, 4:20-CV-04010-KES Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR vs. SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ADOPTING IN FULL ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING THE HARTFORD; HARTFORD IN PART MOTION TO COMPEL FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.; and HARTFORD CASUALTY INS. CO., Defendants. Plaintiff, Tim Rounds, filed a complaint against defendants (collectively, “Hartford”) for common law bad faith and for unfair trade practices under SDCL § 58-33-5. Docket 1 at 9. Rounds seeks compensatory and punitive damages and attorney’s fees and costs as…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.