Legal Opinion

Quality Care of Nashville v. Waller

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1979PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENRY F. TODD, Special Justice.

The defendants, Quality Care of Nashville and Travelers Insurance Companies have appealed from a judgment of the Trial Judge awarding to the plaintiff, an employee of Quality Care, benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

*780On appeal, no issue is made as to the amount of the award. The only question raised by appellants is the applicability of the Workmen’s Compensation Law to the injury of plaintiff under the special circumstances of the case.

The facts are not controverted. Plaintiff is a nurse’s aide and is employed from time to time by Quality Care…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Central Surety & Insurance v. Mrs. Cora Trawick CourtTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Knox v. BatsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Little v. Johnson City Foundry & MacHine Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Bennett v. Vanderbilt UniversityTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Smith v. Camel Mfg. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lollar v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Holder v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Lovell v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County Ex Rel. Nashville Electric ServiceTennessee Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API