Legal Opinion

People v. Ortiz

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 1962No. Crim. 7857PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

Appellant and his wife Lupe were charged in an indictment with possession of a narcotic (heroin) in violation of section 11500, Health and Safety Code. It was also charged that appellant had suffered three prior felony convictions, two of which were for burglary; the third involved narcotics.

Both appellant and his wife were found guilty as charged. The court also determined that the alleged prior convictions were true. Appellant’s motion for a new trial was denied. He was sentenced to the state prison. He has appealed from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.

In the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Scher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. People v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Bompensiero v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Lorenzen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. BeasleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. People v. BeasleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  4. People v. RuparCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. People v. GarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API