People v. Rupar
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BRAY, J. *
After conviction by the court (jury having been waived) of violation of Penal Code, section 459 (burglary) and sentence granting probation, defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction and sentence.
Questions Presented
1. Was search of defendant’s premises illegal because no Dorado warning was given ?
2. Was force and coercion used to obtain defendant’s permission to search her premises ?
3. Did the court err in not requiring identity of the police informant to be disclosed ?„
1. Consent
Inasmuch as no contention is made that the evidence was insufficient to justify the court's…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Ballard v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Priestly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- People v. BilderbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. McShannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. ManningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- People v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. LinkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- People v. ShipsteadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.