Legal Opinion

Barnardin v. Northall

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana

Decided November 10, 1897No. 9,358PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This was a suit in equity by Alfred L. Barnardin against William 11. Xorthall and others. The cause was heard on defendants’ motion to strike the amended bill from the files.

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, District Judge.

On September 28, 1897, leave was granted complainant to file an amended bill on payment of “all the costs of the suit to date.” The costs taxed by the clerk were paid, and the amended bill was filed. The defendant now moves to strike the amended bill from the files because an attorney’s fee of §52.50 was not taxed and paid upon each deposition that was taken in (he cause. The only depositions in the cause were taken by the complainant. They have never been admitted in evidence upon a hearing before (he court or a master in chancery. There has not boon any hearing of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Indianapolis Water Co. v. American Straw-Board Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Hudson River Stone Supply Co. v. Venable Const. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1904
  2. Alaska S. S. Co. v. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  3. The MaryDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API