Legal Opinion
People v. Williams
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 10, 2000PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The contention of defendant that his first attorney was ineffective does not survive the waiver of his right to appeal (see, People v Petgen, 55 NY2d 529, 534-535, rearg denied 57 NY2d 674; People v Ferguson, 192 AD2d 800, lv denied 82 NY2d 717). The alleged instances of ineffectiveness on the part of defendant’s second attorney, raised in the pro se supplemental brief, are based upon matters outside the record and thus are not subject to review on direct appeal (see, People v Ford, 184 AD2d 1013, lv denied 80 NY2d 929).
The contention that defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. PetgenNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. FergusonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. JeffreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. RussellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. HarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. DibbleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. NixonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.