Legal Opinion

People v. Nixon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw the guilty plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant has failed to preserve for our review his contention that he was coerced into pleading guilty (see, People v Williams, 272 AD2d 986; People v Newman [appeal No. 1], 231 AD2d 875, lv denied 89 NY2d 944). In any event, that contention is without merit. Defendant further contends that he could not be convicted of both criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]) and criminal pos*942session of a controlled substance in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. People v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. People v. NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. HobartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. People v. McCorkleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. People v. BannerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API