Brutoco Engineering & Construction, Inc. v. United States

OPINION

NAPIER, Judge:

This case comes before the Court on defendant’s motion and plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment. Both parties contend that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Jurisdiction is founded on the Contract Disputes Act of 1982, 41 U.S.C. § 609(a)(1) (1982).

The dispute in this case concerns the interpretation of inconsistent provisions in a contract regarding the proper method of payment for the resealing of existing joints in Portland cement concrete (PCC) pavement along hanger aprons at the Naval Air…