Legal Opinion
Monarch Painting Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 8, 1989No. 792-86CPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
This case is before the court on defendant’s renewed motion for partial summary judgment. Plaintiff has opposed, and argument has been held. After a motion based on the same grounds was denied from the bench by an order entered on January 27, 1988, defendant conducted additional discovery and brought its renewed motion on the basis of a supplemental record.
FACTS
The following facts are undisputed.1 On June 18, 1984, the Contracting Division of the 172d Infantry Brigade, now the Directorate of Contracting, 6th Infantry Division of the United States Army (the “Army”),…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Conner Brothers Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- International Transducer Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- PBI Electric Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Gresham, Smith & Partners v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.