Legal Opinion
Ouellette v. Town of Kingston
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 15, 2008No. 2007-589PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The plaintiffs, Scott Ouellette and other Kingston residents, appeal an order of the Superior Court {McHugh, J.) affirming the decision of the Town of Kingston Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) granting approval to the intervenor, Konover Development Corporation (Konover), to construct a supermarket within the town’s historic district. We affirm.
The trial court found or the record supports the following. In April 2006, Konover applied to the Town of Kingston Historic District Commission (HDC) for a certificate of approval to construct a supermarket on an eleven-acre lot abutting Route 125 and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Caserta v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Vannah v. Town of BedfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
- Cook v. Town of SanborntonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Town of Hinsdale v. Town of ChesterfieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Boccia v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. GuaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Saunders v. Town of KingstonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Lakeside Lodge, Inc. v. Town of New LondonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- Farrar v. City of KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Accurate Transport, Inc. & a. v. Town of DerrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.