McDaniels v. City of Philadelphia
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinión
RUFE, J.
Before the Court is Defendant City of Philadelphia’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons that follow, the motion is denied, as there are factual disputes regarding nearly every element of Plaintiffs claim, and Defendant has failed to put forward any compelling evidence or argument that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
I. BACKGROUND
This ease concerns the shooting death of Aaron Lamar McDaniels by Jermias Olivo, a Philadelphia Police Officer with a checkered past.1 The parties have stipulated to some of the following facts, although others remain…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Does v. Southeast Delco School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Kirksey v. RossDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- CURRAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- DIXON v. SCHWEIZERDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- LANDRY v. WEST CAIN TOWNSHIPDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.