Legal Opinion

In Re Vioxx Products Liability Litigation

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided September 4, 2007No. MDL 1657PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER & REASONS

FALLON, District Judge.

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO ALL CASES

Before the Court are Special Master Paul R. Rice’s Report and Recommendations (Rec. Docs. 11566 & 11882) on a representative sampling of documents as to which Merck & Co., Inc. has asserted privilege in this multidistrict litigation (“MDL”), and Merck’s Motions to Adopt in Part the Special Master’s Report and Recommendations and Merck’s Objections Thereto (Rec. Docs. 11729 & 12020), which have been filed under seal.

This discovery dispute has dragged on for over a year and at times has seemed hopelessly endless. Although…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
  4. Garner v. WolfinbargerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  5. Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. In Re Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. RBS Citizens, N.A. v. HusainDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  3. Phillips v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2013
  4. Maplewood Partners, L.P. v. Indian Harbor InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
  5. Towne Place Condo. Ass'n v. Phila. Indem. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API