State v. Atkinson
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:
¶ 1 Defendant Dennis Rolland Atkinson appeals from the district court’s sentencing decision. He contends that the district court improperly weighed mitigating and aggravating sentencing factors because the court failed to apply the Americans with Disabilities Act (the ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act (the Rehab Act) when sentencing Defendant to prison. See generally 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (Supp. II 2008); 29 U.S.C. §§ 791-794g (Supp. II 2014). Because Defendant did not specifically argue to the district court that the ADA and the Rehab Act apply to criminal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. MoaUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. ValdovinosCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- State v. WanosikUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. KozlovCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- State v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. LittlejohnCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021