Legal Opinion

Buckley v. Fredericks

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1980No. 12539PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion when it admitted defendant’s expert testimony concerning the speed of his car. We hold that there was no abuse of discretion and affirm the judgment.

Shortly after midnight on May 25, 1974, four young men were involved in a one car accident on Lincoln County Highway 117. The car, driven by defendant Steve Freder-icks, missed a curve, rolled over, and ended up in a ditch.

At trial three of the eyewitnesses testified. Back seat passengers Dan Sarutzki and plaintiff James Buckley testified that despite their pleas to slow…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. BoykenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  2. State Ex Rel. Helgerson v. RiiffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Wentzel v. HuebnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Heidner v. GermschiedSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Kleinsasser v. GrossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kuper v. Lincoln-Union Electric Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People in Interest of SRSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Schaffer v. Edward D. Jones & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Zepp v. HofmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Application of WiddisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API