Legal Opinion

DeMoss v. City of Coeur D'Alene

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1990No. 17507PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff appellants (DeMoss et al.) brought suit in district court against defendant respondents (City of Coeur d’Alene et al.), seeking recovery for mental anguish *177resulting from exposure to asbestos. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the city on the following grounds: (1) that the worker’s compensation exclusivity provisions barred any tort recovery; (2) that, in the alternative, the statute of limitations barred any tort recovery; and (3) that plaintiffs could not maintain an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because the city was not acting under…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Martinez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Patricia Marek v. Hecla, LimitedIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Willie v. Board of TrusteesIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Dominguez v. Evergreen Resources, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Burggraf v. ChaffinIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Dominguez Ex Rel. Hamp v. Elias (In Re Elias)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API