Legal Opinion

United States v. Boasmond

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided September 30, 1998No. NMCM 97 00788Published

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Judge:

We have examined the record of trial, the four assignments of error,1 and the Government’s response. We conclude that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant was committed. See Art. 59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a) and 866(c)(1994) [hereinafter UCMJ].

A military judge sitting as a general court-martial found the appellant guilty, pursuant to his pleas, of attempted desertion and assault in which grievous bodily harm was inflicted in violation…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  3. United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  4. United States v. SnellingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. HealyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API