Legal Opinion

Cardot v. Ball

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to abide the event, and motion denied, without costs. Memorandum: While we think that the provisions of section 324 of the Civil Practice Act are broad enough to authorize the Special Term to compel submission, under proper safeguards, to chemical tests of property and materials in the possession or under the control of a party to the action (Reiss v. Kirkman & Son, Inc., 242 App. Div. 77; Lumb v. Beaumont, 27 Eng. Law Rep. 356 [Ch. Div.]), we conclude that, upon the record at hand, the court erred in making the order appealed from. In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reiss v. Kirkman & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. Easton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Easton v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Easton v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Petruk v. South Ferry Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  2. Nasoff v. Hills Supermarket, Inc., New York County Courts1963
  3. Salzo v. Vi-She Bottling Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Scully v. Farragut Refrigeration Co.New York Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Tripp v. KnoxNew York Supreme Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API