Legal Opinion
Easton v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 13, 1935No. Claim No. 22287PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRhodes, J.
The claimant is satisfied with the amount of the award for land appropriated. His grievance is that the court below refused to award damages to land belonging to him not appropriated.
The original claimants were the appellant and Nellie M. Easton, his wife. Mrs. Easton died before the rendition of judgment herein *440and, by order of the court below, appellant has been made the sole claimant.
The State of New York, for the purpose of ehminating a grade crossing over the "Ulster and Delaware railroad on State Highway No. 30, in the town of Roxbury, county of Delaware, appropriated .493 acres of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- South Buffalo Railway Co. v. KirkoverNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- County of Erie v. . FridenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cardot v. BallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Huey v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1939
- Iroquois Gas Corp. v. KasprzykAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Vanderbilt v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1936
- Kuehl v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1966