Legal Opinion
Reiss v. Kirkman & Son, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 3, 1934PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
The defendant, having been sued for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered by the plaintiff through the use of a certain product manufactured by defendant, sought to obtain an order pursuant to the provisions of section 324 of the Civil Practice Act and rules 140 and 141 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for the discovery of a portion of the article or property constituting the basis of the action, for the purpose of analysis.
The motion was granted and the order provided that “.the plaintiff produce and discover and deliver to the attorney for the defendant ” a small…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Beyer v. Transit Development Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Gimenez v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Jerry & Herbert Lehmann, Inc. v. Turtle Bros.New York Supreme Court · 1933
- Beauty Silk Manufacturing Co. v. KrumholzNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- Sutter v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
3Cited by16 opinions
- Joseph Mazzi v. Greenlee Tool Co. And Greenlee Bros. & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Bartlett v. SanfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Petruk v. South Ferry Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- Lyon v. Fieldgren Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948
- Bender v. William Cooper & Nephews, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.