Spaulding v. State Farm Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Brailsford, Justice:
This controversy began with a three-car collision, in which an unidentified automobile collided with an automobile operated by one Goude, causing the Goude automobile to collide with plaintiff’s vehicle. Plaintiff’s tort action against Goude and “John Doe,” as operator of the unknown vehicle, resulted in a verdict in plaintiff’s favor against “John Doe” alone for $7,500.00, thus exonerating Goude. Plaintiff then brought this action to recover the amount of the judgment against her automobile liability insurer on the uninsured motorist endorsement of her policy. She was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Coker Ex Rel. Estate of Coker v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
- Wynn Ex Rel. Wynn v. DoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
3Cited by10 opinions
- Clark v. Regent Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- ILLINOIS NAT'L INSURANCE CO. v. PalmerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. LeJeuneIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Davis v. DoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Veronica Louthian v. State Farm Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.