Hacker v. ArcelorMittal Tubular Products USA LLC
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION RONALD HACKER, et al., ) CASE NO. 1:24-CV-00341 ) Plaintiffs, ) JUDGE BRIDGET MEEHAN BRENNAN ) v. ) ) ARCELORMITTAL TUBULAR ) MEMORANDUM OPINION PRODUCTS USA LLC, et al., ) AND ORDER ) Defendants. ) Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 14.) Plaintiffs opposed (Doc. 17), and Defendants timely replied (Doc. 19). Relatedly, Plaintiffs’ move to strike an affidavit Defendants submitted in support of their Motion to Dismiss. (Docs. 22-24.) For the reasons set forth below, the motion to strike is GRANTED, and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Joe D'Ambrosio v. Carmen MarinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Cataldo v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.