Legal Opinion

Ex parte Lee Fong Fook

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 23, 1948No. 27790PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODMAN, District Judge.

On August 25, 1947, petitioner arrived at the Port of San Francisco aboard the steamship General Meigs on a return trip from China. He was refused entry to the United States by Immigration officials, and ever since arrival has been and still is detained in their custody. While he was in such detention, an Immigration Board of Special Inquiry (8 U.S.C.A. § 153) conducted hearings on a number of different days in October and November of 1947, at all of which petitioner was represented by counsel of his choosing. On December 1, 1947, the Board of Special Inquiry denied…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wright v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. United States v. Sing Tuck or King Do & Thirty-OneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Shelton v. TiffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  4. United States Ex Rel. Stapf v. CorsiSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Principe v. AultDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Johnston v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  2. Hartford v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Ly Shew v. AchesonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
  4. United States Ex Rel. Mezei v. Shaughnessy, District Director, Immigration and NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  5. Lee Fong Fook v. WixonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API