Legal Opinion

Lee Fong Fook v. Wixon

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 8, 1948No. 11860PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant arrived at the port of San Francisco on his return from a visit to China and was there detained by the immigration authorities. After a hearing before a board of special inquiry he was denied admission on a finding that he is an alien immigrant without visa. He thereafter entered an appeal to the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization. Pending the appeal he petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus asserting that he is an American citizen by birth and that his detention is unlawful.

The court issued the writ, to which the district director made a return incorporating the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Sing Tuck or King Do & Thirty-OneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Carmichael v. DelaneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  3. Ex parte Lee Fong FookDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1948

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Johnston v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  2. Thomas v. TeetsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  3. Duffy, Warden v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  4. United States Ex Rel. Mezei v. Shaughnessy, District Director, Immigration and NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  5. United R.R. Operating Crafts v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. Brotherhood of R.R. Trainmen v. United R.R. Operating CraftsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API