Legal Opinion
Sageman v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 27, 2008No. 08-208CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The plaintiff, Earl Sageman, filed a pro se complaint in this court on March 24, 2008. He also submitted a request to proceed in forma pauperis. The plaintiff indicates in his complaint that he owns a farm and states that the “defendants” are seeking foreclosure against him on that farm. Plaintiff names as defendants the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Farm Service Agen*368cy (FSA), the Office of CM Rights (OCR), the Office of General Counsel (OGC), and the Department of Justice (DOJ).1 As jurisdictional and substantive support for his…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Caddell Construction Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Searles v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Vincent v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017