Legal Opinion
Searles v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 18, 2009No. 09-218CPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court is the June 12, 2009 motion of the defendant (“United States” or “the government”) to dismiss the complaint of the plaintiff, Mr. Searles. The government asks that the case be dismissed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons that follow, the government’s motion is GRANTED.
A. Statement of Facts
Mr. Searles alleges that he is the owner of Omegaman Fireprotection (“Omegaman”) and a disabled veteran. In…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. White Mountain Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Roland A. Leblanc v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Augustin S. James v. Louis Caldera, Secretary of the Army and Philip J. SchrockCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lengen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Bussie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Gable v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Bobka v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Capelouto v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.