State v. Nalewajk
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Per curiam
This opinion follows oral argument on this court's own motion to determine whether the present appeal should be dismissed as moot because the defendant, Albert Edward Nalewajk, died during the pendency of his appeal from the dismissal of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. We conclude that we lack subject matter jurisdiction and, accordingly, dismiss the appeal.
The relevant facts are not disputed. The defendant pleaded guilty to the charges of possession of narcotics with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 2009) § 21a-278 (b)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- State v. TrantoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. BostwickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Burbank v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. AllanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. SanchezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019