Legal Opinion

State v. Nalewajk

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 11, 2019No. AC39195PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This opinion follows oral argument on this court's own motion to determine whether the present appeal should be dismissed as moot because the defendant, Albert Edward Nalewajk, died during the pendency of his appeal from the dismissal of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. We conclude that we lack subject matter jurisdiction and, accordingly, dismiss the appeal.

The relevant facts are not disputed. The defendant pleaded guilty to the charges of possession of narcotics with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 2009) § 21a-278 (b)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  2. State v. TrantoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. State v. BostwickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. Burbank v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  5. State v. AllanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. SanchezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API