Legal Opinion
State v. Bostwick
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 2, 1999No. SC 16127PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The defendant, Charles Bostwick, was charged by information with violating the conditions of his probation. Following a trial to the court, McKeever, J., he was found guilty and sentenced to the unexecuted portion of his prison sentence. The defendant then appealed to the Appellate Court, which affirmed his conviction. State v. Bostwick, 52 Conn. App. 557, 559, 728 A.2d 10 (1999). Thereafter, this court granted the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a violation of probation need not be wilful…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Loisel v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- In re Romance M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Conetta v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. TrantoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. BostwickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by15 opinions
- State v. McElveenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Polizos v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- In re Jeffrey C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.