Legal Opinion

Rosenzweig v. Roitman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 5, 1932No. Gen. No. 35,547PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keener

August 7, 1931, complainant, holder of a $500 bond out of an issue aggregating $120,000, secured by a trust deed to Liberty Trust and Savings Bank as trustee, filed his bill seeking the appointment of a receiver and the foreclosure of the trust deed. August 12,1931, the bill was dismissed for want of equity. From this decree complainant appealed, and the ruling of the court in dismissing the bill is assigned as error.

The pertinent material allegations of the bill are that on June 1,1928, the defendants, Joseph Roitman and Esther Roitman, his wife, being indebted in the aggregate in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chicago & Vincennes Railroad v. FosdickSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Muren v. Southern Coal & Mining Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Seibert v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Leonard v. ArnoldIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Vannatta v. LindleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Betten v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934
  2. Gurnett v. Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1932
  3. Dillon v. ElmoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934
  4. Arndt v. ArndtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API