Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Falk v. Sheriff of N.Y. County

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1932PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

An order of the Supreme Court, entered upon a decision of this court, adjudged that William F. Doyle, a witness upon a legislative inquiry, stand committed “ until he answers the question whether he has bribed any public officer ” (Matter of Doyle, 257 N. Y. 244).

The witness, who was then in jail for failure to answer that question as well as others, appeared before the legislative committee, and answered the question “ no.”

That answer having been given, he applied for his discharge, which was opposed by the committee on the ground that his denial was false.

The Supreme Court sustained a writ…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HudgingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Matter of DoyleNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. People Ex Rel. Hastings v. HofstadterNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Fromme v. . GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Silberman Dairy Co. v. EconopoulyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Valenti v. McCloskeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Parsons v. SteingutNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Nusbaum v. Newark Morning Ledger Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. People ex rel. Miranda v. McCloskeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. United States v. McGovernDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API